1 year ago
ilovecharts: justinalcon: ragbag:





f(x) = ½x + 7





it was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). for the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.





i decided to graph these equations as a handy pocket guide for when i mack on chicks in the library stacks and a few interesting things soon became apparent. for starters, if one is under 14, it is mathematically impossible to date anybody. let’s say my five year-old nephew wanted to join the scene. according to this rule, he could only date girls older than 7.5 (which he would be down with), BUT the same girls also have to be younger than -4. MATH has prevented my nephew from getting jiggy with anybody!





only when you become 14, does math allow you to begin dating—and then you can ONLY date other 14 year-olds. society will scoff at you if you ask a 15 year-old to your freshman day dance, and don’t even think of approaching a 13 year-old.





from 14 on, your options increase at a linear rate such that by the time you are seventy, you are eligible to date 42 year-olds AND 126 year-olds. so the next time that your seventy year-old auntie introduces you to her 126 year-old paramour, give them each a (gentle) nudge and let them know that you support their union.

ilovechartsjustinalconragbag:

f(x) = ½x + 7

it was only yesterday that i realised that the rule of thumb for dating people of different ages (the “half your age plus 7” rule) determines not only the lower bounds for dating but the upper bounds as well—that for each ½x + 7, there is a corresponding 2(x-7). for the last 15 years of my life, i have been ignoring an entire market segment, namely those of the genus cougar.

i decided to graph these equations as a handy pocket guide for when i mack on chicks in the library stacks and a few interesting things soon became apparent. for starters, if one is under 14, it is mathematically impossible to date anybody. let’s say my five year-old nephew wanted to join the scene. according to this rule, he could only date girls older than 7.5 (which he would be down with), BUT the same girls also have to be younger than -4. MATH has prevented my nephew from getting jiggy with anybody!

only when you become 14, does math allow you to begin dating—and then you can ONLY date other 14 year-olds. society will scoff at you if you ask a 15 year-old to your freshman day dance, and don’t even think of approaching a 13 year-old.

from 14 on, your options increase at a linear rate such that by the time you are seventy, you are eligible to date 42 year-olds AND 126 year-olds. so the next time that your seventy year-old auntie introduces you to her 126 year-old paramour, give them each a (gentle) nudge and let them know that you support their union.

  1. frankgarrett reblogged this from jennhoney
  2. jennhoney reblogged this from section9
  3. deathconstantbeyondlove reblogged this from youmightfindyourself
  4. familiarexcuses reblogged this from ragbag
  5. handjives reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    500th post, i think so
  6. paulypaul reblogged this from threesevensandathree and added:
    The creepy scale
  7. threesevensandathree reblogged this from thetylercarter
  8. thetylercarter reblogged this from nickelcobalt
  9. avalianteffort reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    Apparently, it’s socially acceptable for me to date anyone in the window...18-30 years...
  10. thewazir reblogged this from youmightfindyourself
  11. fashionablethought reblogged this from chiefmartinbrody
  12. kiaoracaroline reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    I have referenced this chart so many times for my friends that it’s only right that I reblog it
  13. naessessary reblogged this from mcfandrew and added:
    proofmathisbeautiful needs to see this. There’s an algorithm or formula for everything.
  14. jennhoney reblogged this from glitterbubbles
  15. fuckyeahzorgezorge reblogged this from ilovecharts
  16. isomorphismes reblogged this from ragbag and added:
    Ah, how one-sided are our love-thoughts. If , then...mapping, i.e. f(Z) = Z,
  17. midwesternjessica reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    Re-found and the topic of several recent discussions.
  18. elmizzle reblogged this from j-vergara
  19. j-vergara reblogged this from on-display
  20. klaatu reblogged this from youmightfindyourself
  21. apparated reblogged this from frigginflamingfawkes
  22. silentcelle reblogged this from tongrhj
  23. tongrhj reblogged this from ragbag
  24. mockfrock reblogged this from marioisgay